Legal Opinion

People v. Lane

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1893No. 20906PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

The defendant was tried for the murder of William G. Canfield. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree, with imprisonment for life. This appeal is from the judgment rendered upon the verdict, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Appellant, at the time of the homicide, was a constable at Sanger, Fresno county. Late at night he went to a house of prostitution for the purpose of arresting the deceased and one Coleman for residing in a house of ill-fame, taking two men whom he found upon the street as a posse to aid him in making the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farris v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. Ah LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People of the State of N.Y. v. . CorbinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. CramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API