People v. Ward
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The points made by appellant for reversal will be noticed in the order in which they are presented in his brief.
1. The information, I think, is sufficient. The facts alleged therein are, in substance, that, at the date and place named the defendant was the financial secretary of the Pacific Coast Marine Fireman’s Union, a corporation; that by virtue of his trust as such officer there came into his possession, custody, ■and control the sum of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- United States v. GibertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1834
- People v. RoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.