Legal Opinion

People v. Tomalty

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1910No. Crim. No. 229PublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are, stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The defendant was charged by indictment with a felony under sections 113 and 114 of the Penal Code. Upon his trial he was found guilty as charged, and upon judgment being pronounced against him he appealed to this court from the. judgment, and the orders denying his motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial. The order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment is not appealable (Pen. Code, sec. 1237), but this is of no consequence, for any error committed by the court in denying such motion is reviewable on appeal from the judgment (Pen. Code, see. 1259).

Section 113 of the Penal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. EbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Loder v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API