Neal v. Boeing Airplane Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoch, J.:
The question presented by this appeal is whether an injury to an employee suffered as a result of a sportive act or “horseplay” in which he was indulging, is compensable under the. workmen’s compensation act. • The commissioner and the district court upon appeal denied compensation on the ground that the injury did not arise out of the employment. The claimant appeals.'
We are not here dealing with any question of controverted fact. At the hearing before the commissioner there was some conflict *323of testimony as to the circumstances under which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Monson v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- White v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Stuart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Siebert v. HochSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Pence v. Centex Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Orr v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Shapaka v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.