Legal Opinion

White v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1919No. 21,832PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1; Edward L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson,.J.:

The plaintiff was given judgment under the workmen’s compensation act against the defendant, who was his employer. Plaintiff’s injuries were occasioned through a mischievous prank perpetrated .upon him by some of his fellow workmen. They fastened an electrically charged wire to an iron door on the defendant’s premises. Plaintiff had to *91pass through this door when his day’s work was done and when he had washed and dressed to go home. On touching the gate plaintiff was severely shocked and more or less permanently injured.

It is needless to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monson v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Stuart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Sedlock v. Carr Coal Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Monson v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Cassell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Conklin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API