Legal Opinion

Pence v. Centex Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1962No. 42,837PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case where the claimants recovered in the proceeding before the Compensation Director and in the district court. The respondent, employer, and the insurance carrier appeal.

The proceeding was instituted by Rose Pence as the widow of her deceased husband and as guardian of his sole dependent minor child, hereinafter referred to as claimants or appellees, against Centex Construction Company, Inc., the employer, and its insurance carrier, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Holler v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Carney v. HellarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Inland Container Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Lyon v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Jacobs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Box v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API