Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1919No. 21,995PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1Ed-ward L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered- by •

Mason, J.:

Daisy Thomas, an employee of the Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company, about 17 years of age, recovered a judgment against her employer under the workmen’s compensation law, and the defendant appeals.

The principal question involved is whether the plaintiff’s injury was one arising out of and in the course of her employment. A suggestion is made that it did not result from accident, but the occurrence relied upon seems clearly to fall within the definition of that term. The evidence in behalf of the plaintiff tended to show these facts:…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Corpora v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API