Legal Opinion

Stuart v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1918No. 21,247PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; Al-. bert J. Herrod, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff recovered judgment under the workmen’s compensation act for $1,690, and the defendant appeals.

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a laborer in the defendant’s water and light department, and at the time *308of the injury which is the basis of this action the plaintiff was engaged in mixing and carrying mortar to other workmen who were repairing boilers in the defendant’s plant. The other workmen were working about twenty feet above the ground. After mixing the. mortar, the plaintiff carried it in a bucket to a hook on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. In re LoperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Cassell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Socha v. Cudahy Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. White v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API