Legal Opinion

Dykema v. Muskegon Piston Ring Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1957No. Docket 40, Calendar 47,027PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff sought damages, alleging that defendants falsely and negligently advised him, as a stockholder, that a merger of defendant company and Thompson Products, Inc., would be consummated upon approval of defendant company’s stockholders, and that in reliance upon said statement plaintiff purchased 1,200 shares of defendant company stock, thereby sustaining large and substantial losses. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s base the trial court directed a verdict of no cause of action, and plaintiff appeals. • ,

Plaintiff bases Ms claim on defendants’ letter of August 27,1951, which read:

“To…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Leland v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Polish American Publishing Co. v. WojcikMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Martin v. HardyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rasheed v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Estate of Detwiler v. OffenbecherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Mt. Carmel Mercy Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Mayer v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API