Legal Opinion

Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1928No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 33,753PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

W. Gurdon Wight and Pearl A. Wight, his wife, were the owners of a dwelling house in Lansing, together with the contents therein. The house was insured in The Fire Association of Philadelphia, and the contents in the Wolverine Insurance Company. North and west of the premises of the Wights, the H. G. Christman Company contracted to build a building. John F. Gohr, doing business as Lansing Excavating Company, was engaged to do the excavating for this building. To do it he operated a steam shovel, the steam for which was generated by coal. It is plaintiffs’ claim that sparks were communicated…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Alpern v. ChurchillMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Inglis v. Millersburg Driving Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hoyt v. JeffersMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Zoltowski v. Ternes Coal & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Blickley v. Luce's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bosak v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Utley v. Taylor & Gaskin, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API