Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Cyrowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 47PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiffs are real estate agents in the city of Detroit. In June, 1919, they arranged with Paul Cyrowski to sell certain property owned by him to one Steinberg. It is their claim that a three per cent, commission was agreed upon. They went to the office of Cyrowski’s brother, the defendant, who was a practicing attorney, to have the papers prepared. Rosenberg testified that while there he said to defendant:

“ ‘Mr. Cyrowski, make out an agreement for our commission.’ He said, ‘What commission?’ ‘Three per cent.’ August said to Paul, ‘Is that right?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Do you know how much it is?’ He…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Buckley v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Banque De Depots v. National Bank of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. Goodrich v. WallerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Strand v. Librascope, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
  5. Sorenson v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1959

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API