Legal Opinion
Leland v. Ford
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1929No. Docket No. 33, Calendar No. 33,774PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] 1. To my mind the serious question presented on this record is involved in the first ground urged. The bill alleges in substance that the Fords agreed that the Lelands should be the managers of the new corporation and should be elected to its board of directors. It also alleges that the agreement, which was an oral one, contemplated a settlement with the Lelands and stockholders other than brokers, others who had bought stock at $3 per share or less, and other…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Clemens v. ClemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Barnes v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Bank of China, Japan & the Straits, Ltd. v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Reynolds v. BolandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rose v. National Auction GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Beit v. BeitSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Dykema v. Muskegon Piston Ring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Jaenicke v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.