Estate of Detwiler v. Offenbecher
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Dale J. Offenbecher (“Offen-becher”), John B. Davies (“Davies”), and Sidney W. Smith, Jr. (“Smith”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing the amended complaint of plaintiffs Estate of Grace A. Detwiler, et al. (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted, and the amended complaint is dismissed.
By virtue of the skill of counsel for both sides — as well as their care and diligence — a thorough and professional autopsy of a complicated corporate…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- Roselink Investors, L.L.C. v. ShenkmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Ciresi v. CiticorpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. GoldfeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.