Attorney Grievance Commission v. Haas
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
The issue this case presents is whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed in this case or, as the respondent, Richard J. Haas, argues, a different and a more lenient sanction is warranted. On motion of the Committee on Professional Standards (the Committee), the respondent was suspended from the practice of law by order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Third Judicial Department of New York, dated May 5, 1997, pending compliance 1 with that court’s February 14, 1997 order directing him to appear before the Committee to be examined under oath and to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WillcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LitmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThaxtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KourtesisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.