Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Thaxton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 2010No. Misc. Docket AG No. 53, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

This is a reciprocal discipline action concerning Ronnie Thaxton, Respondent, who was admitted to the Bar of this Court on July 1, 2002, and to the Bar of the District of Columbia on December 4, 1995. On September 10, 2009, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ordered Thaxton be suspended from the practice of law for one year with six months stayed, followed by a three year probationary period, in which he was required to participate in the District Bar’s Practice Management Advisory Service. The Court of Appeals based its decision on Thaxton’s violation of District of Columbia Rules of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SweitzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SternCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZhangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API