Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Litman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 21, 2014No. 81ag/13PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

This reciprocal disciplinary action involves Donald Saunders Litman (“Litman” or “Respondent”), who was admitted to the Bar of this Court on 18 January 1985 and to the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1989. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania censured publically Litman on 27 November 2012 for violating certain of Pennsylvania’s professional conduct and disciplinary rules. Pursuant to Maryland Rules 16-751 and 16-773, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action on 19 December 2013 against Litman based on his…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SteinhornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API