Legal Opinion
Stalnaker v. Boeing Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 6, 1986No. E002339PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CAMPBELL, P. J.
In this appeal, following defendants’ successful motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs present two issues. First, they contend that similar to Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior Court (1980) 27 Cal.3d 465 [165 Cal.Rptr. 858, 612 P.2d 948, 9 A.L.R. 4th 758] and its progeny, the trial court erred in ruling that Labor Code sections 3600 and 3601 precluded judicial relief. Second, they contend that the court erred in ruling that they could not maintain a constitutional tort action modeled on Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents (1971) 403 U.S. 388 [29 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Huggins v. Longs Drug Stores California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Leger v. Stockton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Multani v. Witkin & NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.