Davis v. Passman
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971), held that a “cause of action for damages” arises under *230the Constitution when Fourth Amendment rights are violated. The issue presented for decision in this case is whether a cause of action and a damages remedy can also be implied directly under the Constitution when.the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment is violated. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, en banc, concluded that “no civil action for damages” can be thus implied. 571 F. 2d 793, 801 (1978). We granted certiorari, 439 U. S. 925 (1978), and we now…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,025 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
3,020 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.