Legal Opinion

Multani v. Witkin & Neal

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 2013No. B237295PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.

INTRODUCTION

The Castle Green Homeowners Association notified Afshan and Rahim Multani that they were delinquent in paying their monthly assessment fees. After the Multanis disputed the debt, the association conducted a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of their condominium unit. The Multanis sued to set aside the foreclosure alleging irregularities in the sale notices and procedure. They further alleged that the association and its agents had committed tortious acts during the foreclosure process.

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment or adjudication arguing that the court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. San Diegans for Open Gov't v. San Diego State Univ. Research Found., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Avetisyan v. Drinker Biddle & Reath CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Buckley v. Katina CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Buckley v. Katina CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Conservatorship of Thomas CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API