Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Doherty
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 2004No. H026670PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALSH, J.
Johnn and Margaret Knapp (Borrowers) lost their home through nonjudicial foreclosure sale in November 2002, nearly one year after the original date noticed for the sale. During the entire time that the foreclosure sale was threatened, they did nothing to cure their default. Afterward, the buyer at the trustee’s sale filed an action to evict Borrowers. Two weeks later, Borrowers sued to set aside the trustee’s sale, claiming that the sale notice was never served, as required under Civil Code section 2924b, subdivision (b)(2). Their suit was consolidated with the unlawful…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Herrera v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.