Legal Opinion

Huggins v. Longs Drug Stores California, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1993No. S030711PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

In filling a prescription for plaintiffs’ two-month-old son, defendant pharmacy wrote directions for five times the dosage ordered by the doctor. Plaintiffs seek to hold the pharmacy liable for their emotional distress from having unwittingly injured their son by administration of the overdose. As is typical in suits for negligent infliction of emotional distress involving family relationships and medical treatment (see Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1071 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 615, 831 P.2d 1197] [hereafter Burgess]), plaintiffs initially urged both a “bystander”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Behr v. RedmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  4. Friedman v. Merck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Gu v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API