State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Board of Hancock County Commissioners
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
R.C. 149.43; Mandamus
The Blade initially requested a writ of mandamus to compel the board to provide access to the settlement agreement. Mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel compliance with R.C. 149.43. State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 426-427, 639 N.E.2d 83, 89.
As The Blade concedes, its mandamus claim is moot because the board has now given it a copy of the settlement agreement. State ex rel. Thomson v. Doneghy (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 222, 685 N.E.2d 537. Therefore, we deny the writ of mandamus based on mootness.
Request for Attorney Fees
The Blade requests…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Thomson v. DoneghyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Russell v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. The Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Patrolmen's Benev. Assn. v. Lucas Cty., Unpublished Decision (1-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.