Legal Opinion

State ex rel. The Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1998No. 1997-1013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 34.] THE STATE EX REL. THE TOLEDO BLADE COMPANY v. BOARD OF HANCOCK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. [Cite as State ex rel. The Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.,

1998-Ohio-299.] Public records—Mandamus compelling Hancock County Board of Commissioners to provide relator access to all records relating to the terms of a settlement agreement containing a confidentiality provision in a civil rights violation lawsuit—Writ denied for mootness when relator has been given a copy of the settlement agreement—Attorney fees…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Hancock County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Info. Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API