Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Russell v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1999No. 98-43PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 149.43; Mandamus

Relators requested a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to provide access to the various records. As the parties apparently concede, this mandamus *85claim is now moot because of the parties’ settlement agreement, which provides relators with access to the requested records. State ex rel. Thomson v. Doneghy (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 222, 685 N.E.2d 537. Therefore, we deny the writ of mandamus based on mootness.

Request for Attorney Fees

Relators also request attorney fees. Under State ex rel. Pennington v. Handler (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 171, 661 N.E.2d 1049, syllabus, “A court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Hancock County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Thomson v. DoneghyOhio Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taxpayers Coalition v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Taxpayers Coalition v. LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API