Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pennington v. Gundler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 94-1658PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a party seeking public records is entitled to an award of attorney fees where the custodian of the public records initially fails to comply with a proper request made pursuant to the *173Ohio Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, then complies with the request in response to a mandamus action.

Pennington concedes that the clerk’s production of the records rendered her prayer for mandamus moot, but contends that she is entitled to attorney fees under R.C. 149.43(C). It is not and cannot be disputed that the records requested by Pennington are public records…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Carter v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API