Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper Arlington

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2000No. 99-2240PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Per curiam

Mandamus

Calvary requests a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to provide her with access to the December 10 collective bargaining agreement drafted by Upper Arlington and considered by the Upper Arlington City Council at three different meetings. Calvary received access to the records on December 29, the *231date the city released a copy of its December 10 draft, as well as the union’s December 29 draft, to the public before council voted on Ordinance No. 221-99.

Under the general rule, the provision of requested records to a relator in a public records mandamus action renders the mandamus…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hurt v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API