Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Education v. City of Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998No. 98-1428PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Under S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5), after the time for filing an answer to the complaint or motion to dismiss, we will either dismiss the case or issue an alternative or peremptory writ. If it appears beyond doubt that the board is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief, a peremptory writ should issue. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Schroeder (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 580, 583, 669 N.E.2d 835, 839.

The board essentially requests a default judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus because of the board’s failure to file a timely response to the mandamus complaint. When appropriate, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Spirko v. Judges of the Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Shimola v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Board of Hancock County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kim v. WachenschwanzOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Copeland v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API