Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pension & Retirement Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 12, 1983No. 58864PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Vice Chief Justice:
Appellant, City of Tulsa (hereinafter City), appeals from an order of the District Court of Oklahoma County dismissing the City’s appeal from Appellee, the Oklahoma State Pension and Retirement Board (hereinafter Board). The City’s petition for judicial review of the administrative hearing was dismissed because the appeal, although filed two days prior to the statutory deadline (11 O.S.1981, § 50-129), was not officially authorized by the Tulsa Board of Commissioners (hereinafter City Commissioners) until four days after the deadline for filing the appeal.
Kimberly L.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mott v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- City of Wilburton v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Tulsa Order of Police Lodge No. 93 v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Comm'n on Ethics of Nev. v. HansenNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSENNevada Supreme Court · 2017
- THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSENNevada Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.