State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. v. City of Bismarck
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
This is an appeal by the City of Bismarck from a judgment declaring part of an alley vacated and awarding costs of $1,439.50, and a cross-appeal by the State Bank of Burleigh County from that part of the judgment which failed to award attorney’s fees. 1 We affirm the judgment.
Suit was brought by the Bank seeking declaratory relief. A court has discretionary power to render a declaratory judgment when it will determine a justiciable controversy. Section 32-23-06, NDCC, and Rule 57, N.D.R.Civ.P. Both the Bank and the City moved for summary judgment, supported by affidavits and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Applegren v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Rummel v. RummelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Channel 10, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 709Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Chas. F. Ellis Agency, Inc. v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moulton v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Nord v. HerrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Retzlaff v. Grand Forks Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- RMM Properties v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.