Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1929No. 18903PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

This action was begun by W. H. Boyd against the city of Oklahoma City and the Oklahoma Railway Company to recover damages growing out of floods on the North Canadian river in June and October, 1923. W. H. Boyd is hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, the city of Oklahoma City as defendant, and the Oklahoma Rail ■way Company as codefendant. Plaintiff's petition alleged, in substance, that prior to 1923, codefendant owned and operated an interurban railway line between Oklahoma City and El Heno; that it owned a right of way upon which its tracks and property were located; and that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ziska v. AveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Sciolaro v. . AschNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Ireton v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tipton v. ClowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bouziden v. Alfalfa Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Rix v. Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Oklahoma City v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API