Comm'n on Ethics of Nev. v. Hansen
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:
*141Assemblymen Ira Hansen and Jim Wheeler seek dismissal of this appeal, arguing that the notice of appeal is void because it was not authorized by the client, the Nevada Commission on Ethics, a public body. Because we determine that an attorney for a public body must have authorization from the client in a public meeting prior to filing a notice of appeal, the notice of appeal is defective and we lack jurisdiction to further consider this appeal.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In November 2013, respondent Assemblyman Ira Hansen received four citations from a Nevada…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- County Council of Prince George's County v. DutcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- City of San Antonio v. Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Guerin v. GuerinNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Dewey v. Redevelopment Agency of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Phillips v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CANNIZZARO VS. DIST. CT. (SETTELMEYER)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020