Legal Opinion

Bedell v. Barber

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1947No. Civ. 13320PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued to forfeit a contract of sale of real property and for restitution of the premises. The trial court found equitable reasons to relieve defendant of her default and entered a judgment decreeing that she should pay the balance due within 15 days upon tender of deed by plaintiff, otherwise defendant should stand foreclosed of any right or interest in the property. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment and the record does not disclose whether the deed was tendered by her or the money was tendered by defendant. If both tenders were made and accepted, or if the deed was tendered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. McDonald v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Chambreau v. CoughlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Freedman v. Continental Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Flanery v. MuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API