McDonald v. Kingsbury
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts aré stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
The action was one to quiet title. The facts as found by the trial court are these: Plaintiff and defendants ’ assignor entered into a written contract on January 24, 1905, for the sale and purchase of real property at the agreed price of $900, of which $50 was paid in cash and the residue to be paid in monthly payments of $10 each, with interest at seven per cent, payable semi-annually, upon deferred payments, time being made of the essence. Plaintiff, by contract in writing, extended the time for the payment of the first four installments until May 20, 1905; that on said last-named date…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Andrews v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bedell v. BarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Miller v. Modern Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.