Freedman v. Continental Service Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Presiding Judge.
This case involves a forfeiture of the buyer’s interest in a land contract referred to as a subdivision trust agreement. The main issue is whether the trial court can exercise its equitable power to invalidate a forfeiture which complied with all applicable legal requirements. A related question is whether notices mailed to but not received by the buyer are sufficient to sustain the forfeiture.
The contract involved is what is generally known in Arizona as a “subdivision trust agreement.” In it, the seller of land, referred to as the “first beneficiary,” transfers…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Valley Drive-In Theatre Corp. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Glad Tidings Church of America v. HinkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Arizona Title Guarantee & Trust, Co. v. Modern Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Hoyle v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Yank v. JuhrendCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Sanson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Wilda v. Mancha (In Re Mancha)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.