Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Continental Service Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 19, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 4573PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Presiding Judge.

This case involves a forfeiture of the buyer’s interest in a land contract referred to as a subdivision trust agreement. The main issue is whether the trial court can exercise its equitable power to invalidate a forfeiture which complied with all applicable legal requirements. A related question is whether notices mailed to but not received by the buyer are sufficient to sustain the forfeiture.

The contract involved is what is generally known in Arizona as a “subdivision trust agreement.” In it, the seller of land, referred to as the “first beneficiary,” transfers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Valley Drive-In Theatre Corp. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Glad Tidings Church of America v. HinkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Arizona Title Guarantee & Trust, Co. v. Modern Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Hoyle v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Yank v. JuhrendCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Sanson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Wilda v. Mancha (In Re Mancha)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API