Legal Opinion
Chambreau v. Coughlan
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 1968No. Civ. 31470PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *
Appellant brought an action wherein he sought recovery of the sum of $8,025 claimed to be due and owing by respondents for legal services rendered to them by appellant’s assignor, Hy Schwartz, an attorney at law.
The cause came on for trial on April 16, 1964, before Judge Ben Koenig. At this time counsel for respondents stated to the court that the action was upon an account that covered a long period of time, had a great many items, and that the respondents (defendants below) would force the appellant (plaintiff below) to prove every item of the account, and the time…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Schwartz v. California Claim Service, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Clausing v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Aleman v. Airtouch CellularCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Sybron Corp. v. Clark Hospital Supply Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Crosby Forrest Products, Inc. v. ByersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Security Pacific National Bank v. RouletteOhio Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.