Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Flanery v. Mudd

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1948No. Civ. 16167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J. pro tem.

Benjamin Flanery, plaintiff and appellant, filed a complaint, to quiet title to certain real estate in Willowbrook in Los Angeles County, against the respondents, Charles W. Mudd and Ruth Truth Mudd, husband and wife, alleging that respondents were in possession of the property and, in addition to praying that his title be quieted, asked for the ouster of the respondents. The respondents denied his title and filed a cross-complaint against the appellant Benjamin Flanery and the other defendants, his wife Goldie Flanery and Wilbur M. Lamb and Hazel M. Lamb, husband and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McDonald v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Bedell v. BarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Laffoon v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Charlotte Guyer & Associates v. Franklin FactorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Smith v. CarletonOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Dunlop v. Hersum Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API