Legal Opinion

Blakely v. Sumner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1911No. 9277PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered May 2é, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellants brought the action, asserting ownership of an undivided three-fifths interest in the land in controversy, and that they were entitled to the possession thereof, which possession was adversely claimed by respondents without right or title. Respondents answered, asserting their right to possession under an oral contract of sale, and prayed for a specific performance. Upon the issues thus framed, trial was had, and judgment entered as prayed for by respondents, from which this appeal is taken.

It is not denied that, in June, 1906, the parties entered into, negotiations relative to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swash v. SharpsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fulton v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. McKay v. CalderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Leslie v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. City of Seattle v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Granquist v. McKeanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Ravarino v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API