Legal Opinion

Granquist v. McKean

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1947No. 30179PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This action was commenced for the purpose of recovering possession of real property and for a judgment for rent due thereon.

The complaint stated that the defendant was in possession as a tenant, had failed to pay rent for a period of twenty-nine months, and had refused to either pay the rent or surrender possession of the property.

In her answer, defendant admitted possession of the premises, denied that she was a tenant of plaintiffs, and then alleged in a “counterclaim and affirmative defense,” in substance, that, in 1937, she and plaintiffs had entered into an oral agreement by the terms of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Woolley v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Walker v. BohannanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Jennings v. D'HoogheWashington Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Vasichek v. ThorsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Powers v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API