Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Forrest

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1896No. 2131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.— Hon. T. M Need, Jr., Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

In pursuance of a resolution of the city council, the city of Seattle applied to the board *424of state land commissioners to obtain a review and readjustment of the plat of the tide lands in front of the city, which was made and filed with the board by the local board of tide land appraisers for King county, and especially a change of the direction and location of certain streets laid out by said local board as indicated upon their plat. The board of state land commissioners declined to consider the petition for the reason that, in its opinion,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of West Seattle v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Blakely v. SumnerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Henry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Town of Ilwaco v. Ilwaco Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gates v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API