Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Webster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1954No. 32692PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— Plaintiffs, as vendees of residential property, seek judgment requiring defendants, as vendors, to deed to them a triangular area adjacent to the property described in the contract of purchase and deed. In the alternative, plaintiffs pray for damages.

In Bowman v. Webster, 42 Wn. (2d) 129, 253 P. (2d) 934 (1953), we remanded this case to the trial court

“. . . with directions to the judge who tried the action to make and enter findings of fact concerning the material issues, as noted above, with appropriate conclusions of law, to be followed by the entry of judgment, from which either party…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Reynolds v. Travelers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Power v. EsareyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. White v. T. W. Little Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API