Legal Opinion

Diel v. Beekman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 1, 1972No. 950-1PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

This matter comes before this court for the second time having been returned previously for trial following reversal of the granting of summary judgment in favor of Hilkeline G. Beekman. Diel v. Beekman, 1 Wn. App. 874, 465 P.2d 212 (1970). Following a nonjury trial on the merits, the trial court entered judgment for Mrs. Beek-man and Harold F. Diel and his wife again appeal.

Separate actions to quiet title to real property were consolidated for trial. Hereafter we refer to the plaintiff-lessees-appellants as Diels and the defendant-lessors-respondents as Beekmans. The difficulties arose…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Woolley v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1972

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API