State of Texas v. Zermeno, Jose Guadalupe
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
In these two consolidated cases, the trial judge granted the defendants’ motions to suppress evidence. The State filed a notice of appeal in each case, but the court of appeals dismissed the appeals, concluding that it did not have jurisdiction because the elected district attorney failed to timely file the statutorily required certification that the appeal was not taken for delay and that the evidence suppressed was of “substantial importance” to the case. 1 The State filed for discretionary review, asking whether the court of appeals’s interpretation of the certification requirement…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- United States v. Steven Eugene Smith, Randy Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- State v. Daniel Villegas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
- State v. Daniel Villegas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
- State v. Lisa Ann Petersen, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
- State v. Mikenzie Renee Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
- Palmer, ZacharyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.