State v. Riewe
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
McCORMICK, P.J., and MEYERS, MANSFIELD, PRICE, HOLLAND, and JOHNSON, J.J., joined.
The trial court granted Susan Riewe’s motion to suppress, and the State appealed. Its notice of appeal did not certify that the appeal was not taken for the purposes of delay and that the evidence suppressed was of substantial importance in the case, as required by statute. The State later filed an amended notice of appeal containing the certifications. We must consider whether the lack of timely certifications deprived the court of appeals of jurisdiction over the case, and if so, whether the amended…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Shute v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by468 opinions
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Bayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- State v. Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
463 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.