Legal Opinion

United States v. Grace

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 15, 2008No. 06-30192PublishedCited by 267 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge FISHER; Concurrence by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS.

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

We granted en banc review of this appeal by the government, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, to resolve two questions. First, does a United States Attorney’s simple certification under § 3731 that the government’s interlocutory appeal in a pending criminal case is not taken for purpose of delay and that the evidence the district court suppressed or excluded is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding suffice to establish our jurisdiction to hear the interlocutory appeal? Second, if so,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by267 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lee Investment LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. FlyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API