United States v. Grace
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FISHER; Concurrence by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS.
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
We granted en banc review of this appeal by the government, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, to resolve two questions. First, does a United States Attorney’s simple certification under § 3731 that the government’s interlocutory appeal in a pending criminal case is not taken for purpose of delay and that the evidence the district court suppressed or excluded is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding suffice to establish our jurisdiction to hear the interlocutory appeal? Second, if so,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by267 opinions
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lee Investment LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. FlyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.