Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 9, 1994No. 103-93PublishedCited by 165 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLEE’S AND STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
OVERSTREET, Judge.
Appellee was indicted for the offense of capital murder, alleged to have occurred on or about August 15, 1990. The trial court granted his motion to suppress his written statement. The State appealed that suppression ruling. The Texarkana Court of Appeals reversed the suppression ruling and held that the statement is admissible. State v. Johnson, 843 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1992). Both appellee and the State appealed the court of appeals’ ruling and sought discretionary review by this Court.
I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- Janecka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- State v. DaughertyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Pham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.