Rassaert v. Mensch
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
In plaintiffs’ amended complaint they pray that the partnership existing between plaintiffs and defendant be dissolved; for an accounting, and “for such other further and separate relief as may be meet in the premises.” The original complaint was filed November 23, 1907, and prayed, among other things, that defendant be restrained from interfering with the partnership property. In their amended complaint plaintiffs allege that plaintiffs and defendant entered into a written agreement of copartnership on September 17, 1907, under the name of the Concrete Products Company, and that said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by9 opinions
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Laughlin v. HaberfeldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Mosher v. HelfendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Bagg v. OsbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.