Griggs v. Clark
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
It seems to us that the report of the referee, and the consequent judgment of the Court, is erroneous in this: That it decrees that the defendants, as surviving partners, are liable for the full amount found to be due of assets collected, or in the hands of these survivors, without regard to the indebtedness of some* $7,500 found to be due in Missouri, on account of the firm operations. We understand that the partnership was formed in Missouri, and comprehended, as well transactions in that State, as in this; and a full settlement should involve and conclude as well transactions there as…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Toland v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.