Bagg v. Osborn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from a judgment. The action is for a dissolution and an accounting of a partnership. The assets consisted of a Canadian farm of 1,280 acres and the usual personal property thereon, all of which were in defendant’s name. The court found the value of the total assets $87,379.21.
Appellant challenges the court’s finding the farm, less mortgages, to be of the value of $68,371.37. The mortgages were $8,049.23. This meant that the finding amounted to a valuation of $76,420.60. Does the evidence support this finding? The evidence is not satisfactory nor is it strong. When the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Amarillo v. RushTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Godfrey v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Sigourney v. MunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Miller v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Matter of Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Cude v. CouchTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Kelley v. the Northwest Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Wiese v. WieseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.