Mosher v. Helfend
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
The litigants in this action formed a partnership in June of 1925 for the purpose of buying English walnuts in Boumania to sell in the United States, and contributed capital in varying amounts, agreeing, nevertheless, to divide the profits equally. Bespondent contributed to the capital of the partnership substantially more than the combined contributions of the two others, who are the defendants and appellants herein. Bespondent alleged, and the court found, that they also agreed that in the event a loss were sustained that such loss would be shared equally by all three.
Bespo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Dukes v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- De Rigne v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Rassaert v. MenschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Merlino v. West Coast Macaroni Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Austin v. TurrentineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.