Legal Opinion
Laughlin v. Haberfelde
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1946No. Civ. 3182PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment
of dismissal after a demurrer was sustained to his third amended complaint, without leave to amend. The record shows that he asked leave to amend.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff had entered into a contract with the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company under which he was to manufacture for that company 270,200 cast steel blocks weighing eighteen pounds each, for which the company was to pay him 21 cents per pound or a total of $1,021,356, and which contract was reasonably worth $272,362; that he was also the owner of an agreement giving him the right to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Clarke v. FiedlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lyon v. MacQuarrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Granite Partners, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Olivet v. FrischlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.